Sheriffs disagree on drug law reforms

Set Text Size SmallSet Text Size MediumSet Text Size LargeSet Text Size X-Large
Share
Updated: 3/30/2009 3:40 pm

With state lawmakers poised to start voting on the budget tomorrow, the St. Lawrence County sheriff and the Oswego County sheriff say the proposed spending plan sends a dangerous message to drug dealers, users, and young people. The sheriff of Jefferson County disagrees.

In a joint release issued Monday, Oswego County Sheriff Reuel “Moe” Todd and St. Lawrence County Sheriff Kevin Wells say the reforms of the Rockefeller-era drug laws, included in the budget bill, are likely to negatively affect public safety.

“The Canadian border remains a key entry point for illegal drugs into our communities and into our schools,” Sheriff Wells said, “but this proposal reduces penalties for major drug traffickers. That’s the wrong message and the wrong approach for dealing with the problem of drugs in communities like ours.”

“The problem of illegal drugs that poison our communities and threaten our children has not gone away and changing the law to reduce the punishment for major drug dealers will make it worse,” said Sheriff Todd. “Especially during an economic recession, when more of our young people and citizens are vulnerable to the lure of drugs and easy drug money, we shouldn’t be taking steps that make it easier and more attractive to deal and use drugs.”

The proposed reforms would reduce prison terms for some drug dealers, release some dealers and users already in prison, and make drug treatment available to certain dealers and users rather than send them to prison.

Sheriff John Burns of Jefferson County told NewsWatch50 he believes the Rockefeller drug laws are harsher than need be for punishing small-time dealers and users.

“I think it’s good to lighten the penalties,” said Sheriff Burns. “I think we have bigger fish to fry than the lower level dealer. Treatment centers are probably a good thing. I’m certainly not in favor of loosening drug laws without treatment.”

Burns believes law enforcement should focus on high level drug traffickers. He cited as an example the concentrated effort by his department to eradicate the crystal meth problem in Jefferson County.


Share
2 Comment(s)
Comments: Show | Hide

Here are the most recent story comments.View All

The views expressed here do not necessarily represent those of MyABC50

Confusedpeople - 3/31/2009 3:01 PM
1 Vote
Blah, Blah, Blah, all the cops say things like Wells because they're worried about not being able to be a over powered cops! The laws SHOULD be changed do to people that have no prior records, no criminal history, and have always had a job. Like myself! I recently have been charged for something that the cop knew I did as a minor. So they tried to use that with this charge. I have no priors nor never been to jail for anything,but I am facing a Class A federal felony. I was charged with a conspiracy charge just because they heard me talking to someone on a phone tap,and because of my name. Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying I've never done anything wrong, but it was when I was a minor, If I have done anything else wrong it was not a felony crime. I wish I could go into more details but the case is not over yet!! I am saying this because the min. is 5 yrs. for my charge. For a person in their mid twenties with two children this would be a lifetime for me and my family. Now if they would of just giving a major warning to me or some classes I would have not been in this situation at all. Not to mention more jobs that pay better around the north country would make a big difference in this war against drug dealers!!!

olblue - 3/30/2009 6:33 PM
2 Votes
On the surface it would be easy to agree with sheriff, but first one must be informed before agreeing. Has the current system work to rectify the problem? The facts would support answer of no. About 3/4 of state prisoners have been in prison before, and about half will be back in prison within a few years after release (Macionis, 2007, p. 246). This is despite our extensive use of punishment within the correction facility system (Macionis, 2007, p.246.). Justification for punishment is protecting society from further threats of the offender; by means of imprisonment is a temporary solution (Inciardi, 2007, p245). The price tag for housing inmate is approximately $30,000 dollars a year, and with current information provided, it sounds like throwing money away. So what is the cost for citizen’s safety? The answers to this problem, lies before the Criminal Justice and society as a whole. It comes down to who is going to flip the bill to create a better system in dealing with those who pose a threat to our community’s safety. It is evident that incarceration does little, to nothing to rehabilitate or to deter the offender’s criminal activity. R. Smith – Lawrenceville - 03/30/09
Inergize Digital This site is hosted and managed by Inergize Digital.
Mobile advertising for this site is available on Local Ad Buy.